Before the fourth
The human rights record of China is being examined by the United Nations through the Universal Periodic Review process.
The Chinese government is making an effort on January 23 to…muster influence and control narratives
In regards to its economic progress, handling of inmates, treatment of migrant employees, and other matters, recent removals of internet material pertaining to these subjects indicate an increased recognition of their delicacy.
An in-depth report on a trial involving torture in Xinjiang was swiftly removed from publication over the weekend. The article was authored by a renowned journalist known for their investigative work.Wang Heyan
The brutal suffering and ultimate demise of Sun Renze.2018, the year of the year
In 2018, a Chinese man who was 30 years old experienced the year.police custody.
The censorship of the article caused significant interest because it contained vivid depictions of torture tactics utilized by Chinese law enforcement. Additionally, the article was published in Caixin, a highly regarded mainstream news source renowned for its coverage of business and investigative topics. CDT has saved a copy of the article.full Chinese version of the original article, as well as another deleted post defending the public’s right to know about the trial
Regarding the police violence that resulted in Sun’s passing.
Gu Ting and Yitong Wu, who reported for RFA, observed that mistreatment of suspects by Chinese police is widespread, but commonplace.
It is uncommon for these situations to lead to any resolution in a court of law..
“It is rare for perpetrators, such as Sun, to be brought to justice and the chances of it happening are less than 1 in 10,000.” that
American human rights lawyer Chen Jiangang informed them that.
This is just the beginning.
A 12-minute film showcasing the experiences of individuals who work in different locations.
The documentary, “Three Decades of Working Like This,” received positive feedback from viewers but was eventually removed. The hashtag for the documentary was also blocked on Weibo. This caused a backlash, as many internet users argued that the lives of migrant workers are a valid topic of public interest and should be openly discussed and debated. One commenter lamented
According to the statement, creating a film that portrays the true experiences of the underprivileged population may lead to it being prohibited in China due to its departure from the accepted narrative.
“The term ‘official narrative’ refers to the preferred version of events put forth by those in power.”
Marrian Zhou from Nikkei Asia depicted the challenging lives of migrant workers in China’s major cities in a documentary.
A harsh truth that contradicts the optimistic story promoted by China about its economic progress.:
The film tracks four laborers as they struggle to secure employment in a difficult real estate market where construction jobs are scarce. In order to meet the age requirement of 55, many workers falsely claim to be younger than they actually are. The workers are visibly drained both mentally and physically.
Their hardship is a stark contrast to the optimistic economic outlook portrayed by the leaders in Beijing.
In the beginning of 2021, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced that extreme poverty in China has been completely eliminated, praising it as a remarkable achievement that will be remembered in history.
Aidan Chau, a researcher at China Labour Bulletin in Hong Kong, a nonprofit organization that supports laborers, stated that the video shows that the current economic state is not improving. He also mentioned that there were numerous instances of protests by factory and construction workers in China last year.
[…] “The documentary reflects migrant workers’ reality, the government is worried that it would resonate among migrant workers and people would become angry,” said Li Qiang, a labor activist and director of China Labor Watch. [Source]
William Nee, who serves as the Coordinator for Research and Advocacy at China Human Rights Defenders (CHRD), brought up the issue of government censorship surrounding the documentary about migrant workers.
An instance among many demonstrating the Chinese government’s inadequate performance in protecting labor rights and promoting economic fairness.:
The Chinese government’s stance on labor rights and lack of adequate social support for a large portion of its population raises questions about the validity of their claim to be promoting a “human rights development path” that benefits their citizens. The government’s censorship of information regarding workers’ rights also calls into question Beijing’s assertion that “development” must come before other rights, such as freedom of expression, which allows filmmakers to portray real-world issues.
Countries must not naively give Beijing excessive recognition and accept its perspective without critical analysis. Governments should carefully consider their actions towards China.make the most
Take advantage of this opportunity to advocate for an end to the human rights abuses in Beijing.Source]